|
|
||||||||
The Wharton School, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104
A major challenge in the creation of customdesigned products lies in the elicitation of customer needs. As customers are frequently unable to accurately articulate their needs, designers typically create one or several prototypes, which they then present to the customer. This process, which we call collaborative prototyping, allows both parties to anticipate the outcome of the design process. Prototypes have two advantages: They help the customer to evaluate the unknown customized product, and they guide both parties in the search for the ideal product specification. Collaborative prototyping involves two economic agents, with different information structures and differentand potentially conflictingobjective functions. This raises several interesting questions: how many prototypes should be built, who should pay for them, and how should they and the customized product be priced. We show that, depending on the design problem and the market characteristics, the designer should offer prototypes at a profit, at cost, or even for free.
INSEAD, Boulevard de Constance, 77305 Fontainebleau, Cedex, France
terwiesch{at}wharton.upenn.edu
christoph.loch{at}insead.edu
History: Received: February 1, 2002;
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
C. Terwiesch and Y. Xu Innovation Contests, Open Innovation, and Multiagent Problem Solving Management Science, September 1, 2008; 54(9): 1529 - 1543. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
S. Erat and S. Kavadias Sequential Testing of Product Designs: Implications for Learning Management Science, May 1, 2008; 54(5): 956 - 968. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
T. Randall, C. Terwiesch, and K. T. Ulrich Research Note--User Design of Customized Products Marketing Science, March 1, 2007; 26(2): 268 - 280. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
N. Levina Collaborating on Multiparty Information Systems Development Projects: A Collective Reflection-in-Action View Information Systems Research, June 1, 2005; 16(2): 109 - 130. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |