|
|
||||||||
Department of Economics, Saddleback College, Mission Viejo, California 92692
Modern hierarchical organizations, like corporations, must motivate agents to work hard. Given their pyramid structure, it is not surprising that one commonly used motivator is the promotion tournament. In such tournaments, agents compete to advance to positions at higher organizational levels. Though these tournaments are common, little research has empirically looked at the interface of organizational structure and tournament design. This paper aims to take a step in filling this void by comparing the performance of various tournament designs using controlled laboratory techniques.
Department of Economics, New York University, New York, New York 10003-6687
Department of Management, The Wharton School, 2000 Steinberg HallDietrich Hall, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104-6370
aorrison{at}saddleback.edu
andrew.schotter{at}nyu.edu
weigelt{at}wharton.upenn.edu
History: Received: September 24, 1999;
This article has been cited by other articles:
![]() |
P. Casas-Arce and F. A. Martinez-Jerez Relative Performance Compensation, Contests, and Dynamic Incentives Management Science, August 1, 2009; 55(8): 1306 - 1320. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
![]() |
D. Ryvkin and A. Ortmann The Predictive Power of Three Prominent Tournament Formats Management Science, March 1, 2008; 54(3): 492 - 504. [Abstract] [PDF] |
||||
| HOME | HELP | FEEDBACK | SUBSCRIPTIONS | ARCHIVE | SEARCH | TABLE OF CONTENTS |