Management Science
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


MANAGEMENT SCIENCE
Vol. 52, No. 8, August 2006, pp. 1155-1169
DOI: 10.1287/mnsc.1060.0526
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Faraj, S.
Right arrow Articles by Xiao, Y.
Right arrow Search for Related Content

Coordination in Fast-Response Organizations

Samer Faraj, Yan Xiao

Robert H. Smith School of Business, Universityof Maryland, College Park, Maryland 20742
University of Maryland School of Medicine, 685 West Balimore Street,MSTF534, Baltimore, Maryland 21201

sfaraj{at}rhsmith.umd.edu
yxiao{at}umaryland.edu

Organizational coordination has traditionally been viewed from anorganizational-design perspective where rules, modalities, and structuresare used to meet the information-processing demands of the environment.Fast-response organizations face unique coordination challenges as theyoperate under conditions of high uncertainty and fast decision making, wheremistakes can be catastrophic. Based on an in-depth investigation of thecoordination practices of a medical trauma center where fast-response anderror-free activities are essential requirements, we develop acoordination-practice perspective that emphasizes expertise coordination anddialogic coordination. We argue that expertise coordination practices(reliance on protocols, community of practice structuring, plug-and-playteaming, and knowledge sharing) are essential to manage distributedexpertise and ensure the timely application of necessary expertise. Wesuggest that dialogic coordination practices (epistemic contestation, jointsensemaking, cross-boundary intervention, and protocol breaking) aretime-critical responses to novel events and ensure error-free operation.However, dialogic coordination practices are highly contested because ofepistemic differences, reputation stakes, and possible blameapportionment.

Key Words: coordination; teams; high-reliability organization; practice; expertise coordination; communities of practice
History: Received: August 22, 2002;


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Organization ScienceHome page
S. L. Jarvenpaa and A. Majchrzak
Knowledge Collaboration Among Professionals Protecting National Security: Role of Transactive Memories in Ego-Centered Knowledge Networks
Organization Science, March 1, 2008; 19(2): 260 - 276.
[Abstract] [PDF]


Home page
Organization ScienceHome page
A. Majchrzak, S. L. Jarvenpaa, and A. B. Hollingshead
Coordinating Expertise Among Emergent Groups Responding to Disasters
Organization Science, January 1, 2007; 18(1): 147 - 161.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2006 by INFORMS.