Management Science
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


MANAGEMENT SCIENCE
Vol. 52, No. 8, August 2006, pp. 1170-1184
DOI: 10.1287/mnsc.1060.0530
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Haas, M. R.
Right arrow Search for Related Content

Knowledge Gathering, Team Capabilities, and Project Performance in Challenging Work Environments

Martine R. Haas

School of Industrial and Labor Relations, Cornell University, 365 Ives Hall, Ithaca, New York 14853
martine_haas{at}cornell.edu

Knowledge gathering can create problems as well as benefits for project teams in work environments characterized by overload, ambiguity, and politics. This paper proposes that the value of knowledge gathering in such environments is greater under conditions that enhance team processing, sensemaking, and buffering capabilities. The hypotheses were tested using independent quality ratings of 96 projects and survey data from 485 project-team members collected during a multimethod field study. The findings reveal that three capability-enhancing conditions moderated the relationship between knowledge gathering and project quality: slack time, organizational experience, and decision-making autonomy. More knowledge gathering helped teams to perform more effectively under favorable conditions but hurt performance under conditions that limited their capabilities to utilize that knowledge successfully. Implications for theory and research on knowledge and learning in organizations, team effectiveness, and organizational design are discussed.

Key Words: knowledge management; project teams; capabilities; quality; work environment
History: Received: January 7, 2005;


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Organization ScienceHome page
A. Majchrzak, S. L. Jarvenpaa, and A. B. Hollingshead
Coordinating Expertise Among Emergent Groups Responding to Disasters
Organization Science, January 1, 2007; 18(1): 147 - 161.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2006 by INFORMS.