This Article Full Text (PDF) References Alert me when this article is cited Alert me if a correction is posted Services Email this article to a friend Similar articles in this journal Alert me to new issues of the journal Download to citation manager Citing Articles Citing Articles via HighWire Citing Articles via Google Scholar Google Scholar Articles by Zhao, M. Search for Related Content

Conducting R&D in Countries with Weak Intellectual Property Rights Protection

Carlson School of Management, University of Minnesota, 3-365 CarlSMgmt, 321 19th Avenue South, Minneapolis, Minnesota 55455
mzhao1{at}csom.umn.edu

Multinational enterprises (MNEs) are increasingly conducting research and development (R&D) in countries such as China and India, where intellectual property rights (IPR) protection is still far from adequate. This paper examines this seemingly puzzling situation. I argue that weak IPR leads to low returns to innovation and underutilization of innovative talents; MNEs that possess alternative mechanisms for protecting their intellectual properties will therefore find it attractive to conduct R&D at those locations. A theoretical framework is developed to capture the interaction between firm strategy and the institutional environment. The empirical analysis on a sample of 1,567 U.S.-headquartered innovating firms finds results consistent with the hypotheses that (i) technologies developed in countries with weak IPR protection are used more internally, and (ii) technologies developed by firms with R&D in weak IPR countries show stronger internal linkages. The results suggest that firms may use internal organizations to substitute for inadequate external institutions. By doing so, they are able to take advantage of the arbitrage opportunities presented by the institutional gap across countries.

Key Words: R&D; intellectual property rights; MNEs; arbitrage
History: Received: January 20, 2005;

This article has been cited by other articles:

				G. Pacheco-de-Almeida and P. Zemsky The Timing of Resource Development and Sustainable Competitive Advantage Management Science, April 1, 2007; 53(4): 651 - 666. [Abstract] [PDF]