Management Science
HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
 QUICK SEARCH:   [advanced]


     


MANAGEMENT SCIENCE
Vol. 54, No. 1, January 2008, pp. 208-216
DOI: 10.1287/mnsc.1070.0762
This Article
Right arrow Full Text (PDF)
Right arrow References
Right arrow Alert me when this article is cited
Right arrow Alert me if a correction is posted
Services
Right arrow Email this article to a friend
Right arrow Similar articles in this journal
Right arrow Alert me to new issues of the journal
Right arrow Download to citation manager
Right arrow reprints & permissions
Citing Articles
Right arrow Citing Articles via HighWire
Right arrow Citing Articles via Google Scholar
Google Scholar
Right arrow Articles by Schmidt, U.
Right arrow Articles by Zank, H.
Right arrow Search for Related Content

Risk Aversion in Cumulative Prospect Theory

Ulrich Schmidt, Horst Zank

Department of Economics, Christian-Albrechts-Universität zu Kiel, 24098 Kiel, Germany and Kiel Institute for the World Economy, 24105 Kiel, Germany
Department of Economics, School of Social Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester M13 9PL, United Kingdom

uschmidt{at}bwl.uni-kiel.de
horst.zank{at}manchester.ac.uk

This paper characterizes the conditions for strong risk aversion and second-order stochastic dominance for cumulative prospect theory. Strong risk aversion implies a convex weighting function for gains and a concave one for losses. It does not necessarily imply a concave utility function. The latter does follow if the weighting functions are continuous. By investigating the exact relationship between loss aversion and strong risk aversion, a natural index for the degree of loss aversion is derived.

Key Words: cumulative prospect theory; loss aversion; risk aversion; second-order stochastic dominance; decision analysis theory; risk
History: Received: November 16, 2005;


This article has been cited by other articles:


Home page
Decision AnalysisHome page
P. Bromiley
A Prospect Theory Model of Resource Allocation
Decision Analysis, September 1, 2009; 6(3): 124 - 138.
[Abstract] [PDF]




HOME HELP FEEDBACK SUBSCRIPTIONS ARCHIVE SEARCH TABLE OF CONTENTS
Copyright © 2008 by INFORMS.